Sunday, February 07, 2016

Polytheism in Hinduism


I observed the following while taking to this generation kids of Hindu parents.
  • The "rationality" induced by science into their minds without perspective for their religion / philosophy - largely since they are not indoctrinated like in case of other religions; Which is good and bad as well (I will talk about this as content of my writings)
  • Atheistic overtures or to say the least Agnostic assertions; 
While I respect their rationality and assertions, I found that its not based on understanding of Hinduism; The first questions I often encounter 
  • Why do we have so many gods?
  • Why do they have so many different forms?
I will try to answer these questions as per my understanding; Hindu religion as I see is purely scientific and firmly ecological in its roots, let's delve into verses and facts..

'Ekam sad vipra bahudha vadanti' - Rig Veda, 1-164-146.
- "One alone exists, Sages call it by various names."

Bhagavadgita Chapter 6 : 30:
yo mam pasyati sarvatra sarvam ca mayi pasyati
tasyaham na pranasyami sa ca me na pranasyati  

- For one who sees Me everywhere and sees everything in Me, I am never lost, nor is he ever lost to Me.

“Akashat patitam toyam sagaram prati gacchati | 
sarva deva namaskaram Keshavam prati gacchati |”

- All the water fallen from the sky goes to the sea, similarly salutations to all the gods reaches to the one Lord Keshava;


"Shritischa Bhinnah smritayascha bhinnah 
maharishinam matayascha bhinnah"

Mind is not one. It perceives different things differently at different points of time; Also each mind finds it answers its own way. 


Dasavatara if you closely look is the evolution of the live from Matsya (fish, waterborne), Kurma (Amphibian), Varaha (One resides on Land), Narasimha (Neanderthal form), Vamana (lesser height), Parasurama, Rama, Krishna, (Balarama / Buddha), Kalki; 

We see close bonding with other forms as well in Hindu scriptures w.r.t. Trees like Neem, Pipal, Tulsi etc.. and the deities have different animals either as their vahana's (vehicles) or companions; We have names for them even; To say a few

  • Nandi - Bull of Shiva
  • Anindya (Rat - Vahan of Vinayaka)
  • Mayura / Ghana - Kartikeya
  • Dharma - Maa Durga
  • Garutmanta  - Lord Vishnu.
  • Megha (Cloud) - Lord Indra
At many instance we see that the Hindu texts talks about the all pervading soul including animate and inanimate. In fact Soundarya Lahari 1st shloka says 

śivaḥ śaktyā yukto yadi bhavati śaktaḥ prabhavituṃ
na cedevaṃ devo na khalu kuśalaḥ spanditumapi| - 

Lord Shiva, only becomes able, to do creation in this world along with Shakthi Without her, even an inch he cannot move; - The same is visualized by Oppenheimer while the nuclear bomb exploded over Nagasaki as the "Dance of Shakti";  

Includes even Charvaka's who are materialists and atheists; It doesn't say that the non-confidant shall go to hell; It always says we travel from a lesser truth to higher truth; In order to encompass all we have god in many forms. 

It raises to the next level while saying "Aham Brahma Asmi" - Brihadaranyaka Upanishad of the Shukla Yajurveda;
 Vidyaranya in his Panchadasi (V.4) explains:
स्वतः पूर्णः परात्माऽत्र ब्रह्मशब्देन वर्णितः |
अस्मीत्यैक्य-परामर्शः तेन ब्रह्म भवाम्यहम् ||
"Infinite by nature, the Supreme Self is described here by the word Brahman; the word asmi denotes the identity of aham and Brahman. Therefore, (the meaning of the sentence is) "I am Brahman."
But comprehending the concept is tough and not easy for everyone. Hence while it says Brahman is one, Hinduism lays down the path to realization for each in their own way and form;  It says the soul is immortal and it is the same soul which goes through many lives and forms (including animals) to realize that it is the same Brahman or part of Paramatma;

The Abrahamic religions while agrees that Animals might as well have soul; The soul of the God is not the same as that of Humans let alone the animals. The word used in the Quran to signify a human's innate non-physical essence or soul, is 'nafs', not 'ruh'. Ruh refers to devine soul and nafs that of the Human's. Animal and vegetable souls are dependent entirely on matter for their operation and being. They cease to exist at death. (There's no "doggie heaven.") Only man is made in the image of God, partaking of the divine nature:

  • “Then God said, “Let Us make man in Our image, according to Our likeness; and let them rule over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the sky and over the cattle and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth.” God created man in His own image, in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them.” (Genesis 1:26–27)
  • Man can kill animals, but not man because of this difference of image:
    • Whoever sheds man’s blood, By man his blood shall be shed, For in the image of God He made man.” (Genesis 9:6)
    • “But these, like unreasoning animals, born as creatures of instinct to be captured and killed, reviling where they have no knowledge, will in the destruction of those creatures also be destroyed,” (2 Peter 2:12)
    • “But these men revile the things which they do not understand; and the things which they know by instinct, like unreasoning animals, by these things they are destroyed.” (Jude 10)
Going by the above you can clearly see that Hinduism is firmly scientific and it follows Newton's 3rd law and the law of equilibrium in the sense of karma for all souls. // Another topic in series.

I hope this note has brought out the  logically answers the questions above.  Feel free to share your thoughts and questions.

3 comments:

Sundaram Ganti said...

Yes Sir, Completely agree with you. But, when it comes to the question like establishing the scientific reason to follow and believe in religion, it’s very difficult to come to reason with it. The need of the hour is whether both the cultures, science and religion, are related by conflict or concord? Science can’t value judgements more generally and comes with public acceptance when proved, whereas religion is a web or set of beliefs, which can be adopted or rejected in certain situations than others are. We need to emphasize the importance of religious experience, which sets up systematic rules to improve human condition.

Unknown said...

"The need of the hour is whether both the cultures, science and religion, are related by conflict or concord?"

-- Yeah, as you said its a question; I would like to approach this from the stand point of what part of / which verse of the text is in conflict with science;

Hindu texts parse as I see rarely conflict with current day science, rather they were even applauded by the western scientists for its insights into science.

We shall explore into few more philosophical ideas like heaven/hell, customs etc.. before delving into science vs religion; - Hope this is ok for you.

About "religion is a web or set of beliefs, which can be adopted or rejected in certain situations than others are." -- Thanks for this point;-This requires a full discussion, I shall try to answer as I move through.

Aruna said...

Eagerly waiting for further discussions :)